Pulmonary vascular pressure respiratory swings in COPD and ILD candidates for lung transplantation: Large but different
Juan C. Grignola, Alvaro Calabuig, Pedro Trujillo, Carles Bravo, Fernando Azpiroz, Manuel López Messeguer, Enric Domingo
https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.12348
Abstract
We analyzed the effect of respiratory swings on interpreting intravascular pulmonary vascular pressures (PVPs) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and interstitial lung disease (ILD) candidates for lung transplantation (LTx) and the role of the alterations in pulmonary function tests on the dynamic respiratory variations. Twenty-eight consecutive patients were included. All patients underwent a complete hemodynamic study (right atrial, mean pulmonary arterial, and pulmonary arterial occlusion pressures [RAP, mPAP, and PAOP]-) and pulmonary function testing (force vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in the first second [FEV1], and residual volume [RV]). A subgroup of 10 patients underwent simultaneous esophageal pressure (PES). All hemodynamic parameters and PES were collected during apnea after an unforced expiration (ee) and during spontaneous breathing averaging five respiratory cycles (mrc). The respiratory swing (osc) was estimated as the difference between maximum–minimum values of pressures during the respiratory cycle. Intravascular RAPee, mPAPee, and PAOPee were higher than mrc values (p < 0.05), leading to 11% of pulmonary hypertension (PH) misdiagnosis and 37% of postcapillary PH misclassification. PAOPosc of COPD was higher than ILD patients and RAPosc (p < 0.05). Only PAOPosc correlated with FVC, FEV1, and RV (p < 0.05). ILD PESmrc was lower than COPD (p < 0.05), and it was associated with a significantly higher transmural than intravascular RAPmrc, mPAPmrc, and PAOPmrc. PESmrc was significantly correlated with FVC. Transmural mPAPmrc and PAOPmrc readings determined around 20% of reclassification of the patients compared to ee measurements. Candidates for LTx showed large respiratory swings in PVP, which were correlated with pulmonary function alterations. mrc PVP would be more closely approximated to the true transmural PVP leading to PH reclassification. Adjusting PVP for PES should be considered in COPD and ILD candidates of LTx with severe alterations in pulmonary functional tests and suspicion of a PESmrc far from 0. PES respiratory swings could be different in ILD to COPD patients.